Ai has the potential to address some of the biggest challenges in education, Today, innovate teaching and learning practices and accelerate progress towards achievement. UNESCO is committed to supporting Member State to harness the potential of Ai technologies. used ethically and effectively, educators, institutions, and students must adopt clear guidelines, promote responsible usage, and emphasise AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for genuine learning.
Addressing challenges of using AI ethically and effectively in education requires students to responsible implement and right guidelines rather than replacing their whole learning and critical thinking.
At first, academic misconduct and academic integrity are issues of importance to academic students. Artificial intelligence can make plagiarism and unethical academic behaviour easier. Base on article ScienceDirect by Himendra Ballale, Ai tools can also be a risk on both sides to the facilitating academic misconduct. Plagiarism is become primary component after getting in ai, which is in negative impacts ai can make cheating and unethical academic behaviour easier, raising concerns about upholding standards. Solution for this problem is we can establish AI usage guidelines for student’s. Educational should edify what type of ai that allowed to use and what constitutes academic misconduct. Example university can make permit to the AI for grammar checking but prohibit to use fully generate. Student also should declare how their use AI and what was there used. In conclusion, AI give multiple benefits for student’s to their learning but it can threaten academic misconduct and integrity.
Furthermore, Nowadays students over independently on artificial intelligence instead of their critical thinking and learning skills. In my opinion too much relying on AI can weaken students independent thinking, critical thinking and problem solving skills. Ai should be supportive learning to the students rather than substitute effort, ensuring that students remain engagement learners. Generate AI is a sources for student’s not a replacement, lecture can encourage them to use ai for guidance, ideas and feed while do learning process. Example lecture can allow students to use AI to develop language or suggest ideas but they must jog down their words.Students tent to over-trust AI advice when it’s misleading which can lead to worse decision outcomes. This underscores the importance of educating users on when they rely on Ai
Lastly, ai platforms may collect privacy data through extensive student data collection, risking breaches, surveillance and misuse. Students will blindly trust on ai systems to submit a privacy data on the platform which is it risking on their privacy. Ai gathering amount of personal, habits, academic data and it raising their risk of unauthorised access. For example, ai tracking their habits and keystrokes to detect on plagiarism to collect more data than unnecessary. Ai can collect the data for commercial uses, such as targeted advertising for their companies.
In conclusion, the collection of students privacy by AI getting serious for privacy risk. Stealing privacy data by AI becomes challenges of using AI ethically and effectively in education. In conclusion, addressing the challenges of using AI ethically and effectively in education requires attention to the issues such as academic mission and academic integrity, over independence to the AI and stealing privacy data.
AI can enhancing engagement to the learning, and it must not be replacement for their learning skills and critical thinking. We can using AI as a source of learning and studying rather than a shortcut to students to make their assessment. They should using in positive ways by using this technology and take responsibility on learning experiences.
One Response
The essay shows a basic understanding of the topic, but its overall quality is weakened by language and clarity issues. In terms of language, meaning can generally be understood, yet frequent grammatical errors, incorrect word forms, inconsistent capitalization, and awkward sentence structures significantly affect fluency and academic tone. Regarding organisation, the essay follows a recognizable structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion; however, ideas are often repetitive, poorly linked, and sometimes unclear, resulting in weak cohesion. For content, the points raised—academic integrity, over dependence on AI, and privacy risks—are relevant, but explanations are largely descriptive, loosely developed, and lack precision or strong supporting examples. Overall, this essay demonstrates limited control of language and development and would be placed at MUET Band 3 (lower Band 3).
Congratulations! you did your best in writing with 0% AI involvement. You will do better next time! 🙂